How to Handle Defamation in New York - Romano Law

How to Handle Defamation in New York

How to Handle Defamation in New York

Man in suit seeing dealing defamation after reading a newspaper article about him
Photo by Jay Clark

Updated: September 25, 2021.

Being the victim of defamation can be very stressful.  It can harm your reputation and negatively impact your business.  As you research defamation law online, you might notice that it is quite tricky.  An introductory glance into the complexities of defamation law in New York can help you understand defamation a little bit better.

What is defamation?

In a nutshell, defamation is the publication or communication of a false statement of fact about a person to a third-party, which causes harm to the person’s reputation.  It can be in writing (which is called libel), or it can appear in the form of verbal communication (which is called slander).

What do I do if I think I am being defamed?  

In New York, you are required to specify the particular words used.  Courts typically also require you to state when, where and how the words were spoken or written, and to whom the statement was made. Therefore, if you believe you have been defamed, it is imperative to gather as much evidence as possible.  Screenshot the materials at issue (if applicable), make note of the exact time and place the statement was made, and create a narrative or a timeline of events that could help you explain exactly what happened.  You will want to be able to give the most detailed explanation possible and back it up with proof where you can. 

If the statement (or statements) is printed somewhere or posted online, a good first step might be to ask the person or company to take down the materials and issue an apology or retraction.  However, if you are unsure about what you should do, or if they ignored your request, you may wish to speak to an experienced defamation lawyer to talk about your legal options. 

How can I prove defamation?

When a defamation claim is brought to court, the party asserting defamation must prove:

  • that there was a false statement;
  • the statement was published to a third-party without authorization or privilege (more on “privilege” below);
  • the person being accused was at fault; and
  • as a result, there was some harm done to the accusing party – or the statement constituted defamation per se (we will get to this too). Dillon v. City of NY, 261 A.D.2d 34, 38 (1st Dept. 1999).

The first step in proving defamation is determining whether the statement at issue was a statement of fact, or merely an opinion.  An statement of opinion, typically, is not considered defamation and is protected by speaker’s First Amendment rights.  It is equally important to note that defamation is a false statement of fact.  If the statement is true, it does not constitute defamation.

Keep in mind that the statute of limitations in New York for filing a defamation claim is one year.  However, the clock may reset on the limitation when a defamatory statement is republished somewhere else or to a new audience.

Defamation per se applies to certain categories of statements, where New York courts may not require proof of harm or damage done to you.  These four categories are:

  • A statement accusing you of a serious crime;
  • A statement that tends to injure your trade, business or profession;
  • A statement that you have a loathsome disease; and
  • A statement imputing unchastity on you, if you are a woman. See Liberman v. Gelstein, 80 N.Y.2d 429, 435 (1992).

What are defenses to defamation?

If you have initiated a defamation lawsuit, the person you are accusing may fight back with arguments of their own.  Here are just some of the defenses that could come up in litigation:

  • TRUTH: As previously mentioned, there is no defamation if the statement is true.  The accused party may attempt to show that there was truth behind what they said.
  • OPINION: Also mentioned above – an opinion is not defamation.  If the accused party said something that could be construed as just an opinion, he will probably assert this defense in court.
  • ABSOLUTE PRIVILEGE: In certain cases, a statement may be protected by an absolute privilege, even if it is defamatory.  This usually applies to statements made in legislative or judicial proceedings, and in certain cases, statements made by public officials.
  • QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE: A qualified privilege often applies to statements made by a person who is performing some kind of moral, legal or social duty, and the audience has a common interest in hearing the statements.  For example, a member of a local town board making the statement at a town meeting.
  • FAIR REPORT: An otherwise defamatory statement may be protected where the statement is being published in legislative, judicial or other governmental reports.
  • LACK OF HARM: Except where defamation per se applies, an accused party may defend themselves by claiming that no actual harm was done to the person claiming defamation.
  • CONSENT: If the accused party can prove that she had consent to make the statement, then it is possible that the defamation claim will be unsuccessful.

For many people and businesses, reputation is everything.  If you feel that you have been harmed by someone’s statements, you should talk to an experienced attorney who can help you navigate the complexities of this area of law.

Related Posts

Notice

This Blog is made available by Romano Law PLLC for general informational and educational purposes only, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this Blog you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and Romano Law PLLC or any individual contributor. You should consult a licensed professional attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

Request A Consultation

Please give us a call:

Schedule an appointment:

Or send us a message:

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.